| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
81. Is CrimeWatch vaporware? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: We allow one-time mappings but we don't make them transitive, ie if you're a suspect and someone shoots you then you can always fire back, but if that person has a third party repping them, you can't shoot the logi becaus...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.16 04:02:00
|
82. Hiding in Eve- Why We Cloak - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kadeyoo wrote: The whole idea is great, but far too complex considering the vast amount of casual players. Local is easy, overview is easy, d-scan is easy. The complexity in eve comes from options and strategy, something you do not have to com...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.11 03:18:00
|
83. Game Suggestion: Standings based Empire NPC Jumpbridges. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Garibaldi Sinatra wrote: How about giving us diligent hard working mission runners something new to aim for and use. Im terrible at explaining ideas but hopfully this short explaination will hint at what i am suggesting. I would love too se...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.04 21:02:00
|
84. NEW TEMPEST - CONCEPT PICTURES - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Private Pineapple wrote: Mors Sanctitatis wrote: Private Pineapple wrote: Mors Sanctitatis wrote: Private Pineapple wrote: I clicked on this thread hoping that your OP had some content in the form of links, information, etc so we ca...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.03 22:54:00
|
85. NEW TEMPEST - CONCEPT PICTURES - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Private Pineapple wrote: Mors Sanctitatis wrote: Private Pineapple wrote: I clicked on this thread hoping that your OP had some content in the form of links, information, etc so we can see those pictures. I saw none. You will be dealt wi...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.03 01:20:00
|
86. Freighting ships still terribly inconvenient. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Everyone in this thread is thinking about this COMPLETELY WRONG. I for one am 100% in favor of a "ferry" style freighter. Give it 10% of the EHP of a standard freighter. Allow it to carry a maximum of 30 rigged and fitted battleships. All other ...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.03 00:56:00
|
87. NEW TEMPEST - CONCEPT PICTURES - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Private Pineapple wrote: I clicked on this thread hoping that your OP had some content in the form of links, information, etc so we can see those pictures. I saw none. You will be dealt with in the most harsh way for making a fool out of me, t...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.03 00:48:00
|
88. Module activation delay. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: Yeah, the stuff in my keynote presentation isn't really related to the OP. I haven't specifically looked at how pre-firing modules works, but I'm pretty sure it's all client-side processing today. I'm a fan of moving them se...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.07.02 04:39:00
|
89. Solution to the Gank Problem? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: You can already shoot anyone with -5.0 or lower security status. I fail to see what the issue here is. This. OP is an idiot.
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.30 03:23:00
|
90. Racial Drones, Drone Cruisers, or Drone Mods - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm all for racial drone boosts. There should be rigs to boost drones, modules to boost drones, and a drone bonus for using racial drones with racial ships, in addition to racial bonuses for character races. gallente should get dps increase, minm...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.30 03:14:00
|
91. Mining - some ideas. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
See my thread in my sig.
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.30 03:08:00
|
92. new mining technique (interactive) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
See the link in my sig.
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.25 05:28:00
|
93. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Like having a Loki with you? Buying Faction modules? Flying a Recon? I do a lot of solo PVP. As such, I can't always cart around an extra 4-5 ships to cover all the necessities. Faction mods: You'd be surprised how many ti...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.25 01:45:00
|
94. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Imrik86 wrote: Spugg Galdon wrote: Mors, you have made a common mistake with your analysis of racial E-WAR types. Amarr use tracking disruptors as it completely negates Minmatars ability to apply DPS (ignoring missiles). Forcing them to slo...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.25 00:02:00
|
95. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spugg Galdon wrote: Mors, you have made a common mistake with your analysis of racial E-WAR types. Amarr use tracking disruptors as it completely negates Minmatars ability to apply DPS (ignoring missiles). Forcing them to slow down to the spee...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 16:29:00
|
96. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Istvaan Shogaatsu wrote: I understand what you're getting at, I think. The evolution of Eve Online weaponry doesn't follow the usual "arms race" pattern. In an actual arms race, new technologies erupt frequently, and technologies designed to ...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 16:19:00
|
97. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mira Lynne wrote: TL;DR Bolded Mors Sanctitatis wrote: ignore "how things have always been" with respect to actual bonuses let's junk our existing perception of what races get what bonuses ignoring conventional wisdom Let's set aside the t...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 06:14:00
|
98. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mira Lynne wrote: Please dont Shoehorn my Caldari Hybrid Ships into Long Range for No reason. "Caldari is Snipe Because of Caldari" Is bad. Give me one good reason that Caldari should be the range race. Sorry, but statements like that Irritat...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 03:49:00
|
99. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dirk Magnum wrote: By God you will TLDR this thread. Also I agree with whoever said that everyone is going to be flying alpha-fit tier 3 BCs. Naga and Tornado fleets are the **** of nullsec. :( TL;DR: let's junk our existing perception of wh...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 03:38:00
|
100. SHIP BALANCING: Racial design focus and where CCP lost the plot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kuehnelt wrote: You should aim instead for as detailed as possible an overview, so that you know exactly what patterns you'd be disrupting/emphasizing. For instance, Amarr drone boats are ships that don't really fit weapons and that have lar...
- by Mors Sanctitatis - at 2012.06.24 03:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |